Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I found the press release you were referencing: http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/server_virtuali...

It proves exactly my point: That focusing on power usage is backwards. You should worry about other stuff, like using less servers.

The guy that worries about using less servers can consolidate 159 servers to 28. He saves $5 million dollars and $10k/mo. The guy that worries about power usage itself just buys 159 slightly less power hungry servers. He saves $2k/mo.




Ah, now I understand the distinction you are making. And I agree; get fewer servers, not the same number of slightly more efficient ones, and then you can talk about saving money on power.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: