Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Sure, that's a valid choice.

But when you're implementing a language ecosystem, proud ignorance of other peoples' usage patterns is just embarassing.




Does proud ignorance of IDEs indicate that RMS may be impolitic or undiplomatic? Yes. Does it indicate he "is disconnected with the present technology?" In the world of C/C++, I don't think being willfully ignorant of IDEs and automated refactoring means you are out of date in your technical knowledge, as the grandparent post implied.


I do. There's a reason that CLion is becoming a thing (can't happen fast enough) and Visual Assist has been a de facto standard in C++ development on Windows for years. The tools exist, they just don't exist in Emacs.


Is RMS still involved with gcc at all? (Non-philosophically?)


He claims not doing any development himself for several years now, so I guess this means no.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: