My understanding was that Mono was the "open source CLR." What parts of Mono wou... | Hacker News

Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

login

thinkpad20 on Feb 4, 2015 | parent | context | favorite | on: CoreCLR is now open source

My understanding was that Mono was the "open source CLR." What parts of Mono would this not cover? Once this project gets ported, what barriers to running .NET code on Linux/Mac/etc with performance and reliability comparable to Windows would remain?

DigitalJack on Feb 4, 2015 [–]

Libraries and Frameworks that are MS Only at the moment. I haven't been keeping track of what they have open sourced, so my point may be moot already.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact