A tax-funded road built with the explicit the purpose of giving access to all three of these? Did the places exist there before the road, and if so, how did people get to them? Are the places located very close to each other or just coincidentally on the same road that stretches a long distance?
So I take it that you are agreeing that there is no fundamental difference between a road and the internet, when it comes to people complaining about the government using tax dollars to facilitate access to undesirable places?
Not sure what the downvotes were for. What I asked were honest questions about the road that was described. I think that are many similarities and differences between a road and the internet with regard to whether they should be tax funded.
