> He clearly states US citizens abroad should not pay taxes.
That's not exactly true: he states that US citizens abroad should not pay US taxes. We already have to pay taxes in the places we live, just as non-US citizens living in the US still have to pay taxes in the US.
Imagine someone born in the US. They leave the US at three months old. They live their entire lives in their parents - in their - country. They are educated there. They work there. They don't have a US passport and haven't ever visited the US.
That person should be able to give up their citizenship for free.
Many people even if they don't live in the US get the benefit of people the US citizen. The author didn't live in the US yet still got a Rhodes scholarship.
Why are you so incensed by this? Does it make any difference at all if you know that the only other country in the entire world that taxes based on citizenship rather than residency is Eritrea? Even assuming you grant that the state is a reasonable entity to begin with and it is due tribute from everybody whom it claims ownership over, why should somebody pay tax in a country they no longer reside in for goods and services they no longer make use of?
He clearly states US citizens abroad should not pay US taxes. (edit to add "US" which I thought was obvious)