I'm not an American libertarian, but the (non-american) libertarians I know agree with most of the points you mention.
- a settled body of law, with a justice system to enforce it
yes, and they want more of it. What they don't want is codifying morals and customs into law (eg: gay marriage or not, anti-abortion, anti-most stuff), except for the very basics (thou shalt not kill and stuff).
- a more or less ordered and peaceful society
- a more or less stable currency
well, actually that's one of the central points for most libertarians. Giving the government the power to print money (and to punish private transactions) is very problematic. See: Argentina right now. Or Venezuela.
- civil infrastructure, including transport, utilities and communications
well, yes, but they can be privatized and work as well.
- public health (private medicine will only go so far in protecting the rich in a society rife with infection; plus employees and customers dying of preventable conditions is bad for business)
this one's very debatable, yeah, most libertarians are against public health. I still don't know which is the best option (insurance companies certainly aren't)
- public education (all but the most menial jobs require at least basic literacy and numeracy, and most require significantly more)
most libertarians are against public education, but that does not translate to not helping everyone get basic literacy, it can be archieved through grants or coupons or stuff. Plus at least in my country there are several free private schools available (paid for by religious or other NGOs), of much better quality than public ones.
- some kind of safety net for the poor
some are in favor of that one, they disagree on the how (and very especially on the how it's done now).
- a settled body of law, with a justice system to enforce it
yes, and they want more of it. What they don't want is codifying morals and customs into law (eg: gay marriage or not, anti-abortion, anti-most stuff), except for the very basics (thou shalt not kill and stuff).
- a more or less ordered and peaceful society - a more or less stable currency
well, actually that's one of the central points for most libertarians. Giving the government the power to print money (and to punish private transactions) is very problematic. See: Argentina right now. Or Venezuela.
- civil infrastructure, including transport, utilities and communications
well, yes, but they can be privatized and work as well.
- public health (private medicine will only go so far in protecting the rich in a society rife with infection; plus employees and customers dying of preventable conditions is bad for business)
this one's very debatable, yeah, most libertarians are against public health. I still don't know which is the best option (insurance companies certainly aren't)
- public education (all but the most menial jobs require at least basic literacy and numeracy, and most require significantly more)
most libertarians are against public education, but that does not translate to not helping everyone get basic literacy, it can be archieved through grants or coupons or stuff. Plus at least in my country there are several free private schools available (paid for by religious or other NGOs), of much better quality than public ones.
- some kind of safety net for the poor
some are in favor of that one, they disagree on the how (and very especially on the how it's done now).