Maybe it's up to the more sensible in the kernel "community", to reach out to the developers of code known to be interesting to discuss what's in it for them to do the work required to get it merged, the probability of doing a ton of work, and then being ignored etc etc.
There's a sense in the above of "They haven't submitted us so we don't care." It might not be the best way to make the kernel as good as it can be, if that is the goal of anyone active in the kernel "community." (And maybe it is).
I have a lot of sympathy for someone publishing their code and their results and then saying "I won't play stupid kernel politics, your move." I don't know if that's what is happening here or it's cultural differences or something I haven't thought of. Nor do I know if this particular development is worthwhile merging, but hey, neither does the kernel "community" right?
There's a sense in the above of "They haven't submitted us so we don't care." It might not be the best way to make the kernel as good as it can be, if that is the goal of anyone active in the kernel "community." (And maybe it is).
I have a lot of sympathy for someone publishing their code and their results and then saying "I won't play stupid kernel politics, your move." I don't know if that's what is happening here or it's cultural differences or something I haven't thought of. Nor do I know if this particular development is worthwhile merging, but hey, neither does the kernel "community" right?