Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why would we want to tax consumption of the wealthy (or anyone)? Don't we want to promote spending? The tax code should reward those that make investments, purchases, and donations. Not punish them. They should punish those that sit on their wealth and do nothing with it.


Spending doesn't do as much as starting or investing in new companies or even philanthropy itself.

Gates and Pickety agree on the estate tax which would help for people trying to sit on their wealth and simply pass it along to their heirs. Of course the estate tax needs some improvements.


[deleted]


It's a fiction that money is just sitting around not doing anything.

Given money is just an abstraction that is used to allocate goods and resources that appear in the real world, someone not spending money (or destroying money) means they are letting everyone else's vote count that much more.

If a person has a bunch of money but feels they have less insight than the average person (weighted by money owned) as to how it should be allocated, then society is actually better off if they never use it.

Now the government or specific charities or someone selling things they might otherwise buy might be worse off than if they spent/invested/donated it all (at the expense of those that wouldn't have received any of the money), but them doing absolutely nothing with it is taking away from no one, and in fact raises the value of everyone else's economic "vote" of how resources will be allocated.


I don't think that encourages spending....I think that encourages offshore bank accounts and the like. Anyhow, I'd think that anyone with any type of massive windfall is pretty thoroughly invested so in some capacity it is contributing back to the economy.

I also can't imagine there are many who receive some type of windfall and are just sitting on it!


The idea is that just having money does no one any good. You want to spend it on stuff. Further, having an estate tax caps that accumulation at the end of your life. There may be people who truly don't spend any money, but that would be the minority.


[deleted]


What is this idea of rich people having money sitting in the bank "doing nothing". Do you suppose that these rich idiots have the money in a checking account?


Fair enough. 4% tax on property and capital (historical ROI on capital was 5%). So every fortune should be destroyed after generation of mismanagement or rent seeking.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: