*assuming 3.2 has an exact representation in binary?* It does not have an exact ... | Hacker News

Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

login

leni536 on Oct 9, 2014 | parent | context | favorite | on: Intel Underestimates Error Bounds by 1.3 Quintilli...

assuming 3.2 has an exact representation in binary?

It does not have an exact representation in binary.

thaumasiotes on Oct 10, 2014 [–]

Easy solution: amend the value to 3.25, or 3.125

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact