Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

NYT does a great job of pushing the limits in infovis, but they don't always hit the mark. This vis seems to show an approximate fixed scale on the y-axis, which is good. It means the differences in heights between the blobs are relevant. The fact that they layout multiple charts along the y-axis seems acceptable, in fact it allows for quick comparison between graphs. However, the x-axis is unlabeled and unclear. It seems to roughly represent time, but has no origin. One can sort of deduce approximate time but without a clear label I can't dive deeper into the information. This seems to be the failing of many info visualizations I come across these days. They either optimize for the "quick glace" or the "in-depth analysis" when you can get a happy medium by usually just tweaking one or two aspects of the display (in this case I would argue a labeled x-axis).



"Value of units shipped from 1973 to 2008"


I read the text. My point is there is no visual aid to help you come to definitive conclusions like "Between 1999 and 2002 we see an exponential decline in cd sales." You can guess but that's about it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: