Hmm, I don't think so. The answer for "yes" is to do a `git revert`, which does ...

burntsushi on Sept 6, 2014 | parent | context | favorite | on: Git pretty

Hmm, I don't think so. The answer for "yes" is to do a `git revert`, which does not modify history. Instead, it creates a new commit.

The answers for "no" all involve modifying history, which I think is generally perceived to be quite OK so long as you aren't modifying history that is public.

ladislas on Sept 7, 2014 [–]

yep you're right and the question was already answered in the comments. :)