Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My languages tend to be very innovative or even inventive; e.g. I recently posted this to HN: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/smcdirm/managedti...

My problem is quite the opposite: when the languages are so different from what already exists, people (and even myself) have trouble thinking about how adoption would even occur, at least in the short term.



A lot of languages have made one major mistake: It's not easy to get a development environment going, and some even wanted me to not use vim.

The first step to some kind of adoption is that I can get it running with an "aptitude install crazy-foo-language-dk", maybe after adding a repository. After that, crazy-foo or crazy-fooc should be interpreter and/or compiler, and that's that.


Ya, well, my languages include their own development environments (I see no different from language and IDE, actually). Smalltalk was great in this regard also, to the chagrin of many developers who wanted to use vim.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: