Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

We push DNS into Route 53 at Runscope, and I trust our approach for the reasons you mentioned. Route 53 has a great track record for DNS uptime. If our sync system breaks, Route 53 will keep serving DNS records while we fix the sync system.

On a side note, we actually have two DNS sync systems at Runscope. One handles DNS for individual hosts (like web01.runscope.com) and the other handles public DNS (like www.runscope.com).

Our public sync daemon is tied into ZooKeeper, which keeps a list of active hosts for each of our public services. The daemon updates entries in Route 53 whenever the hosts change in ZooKeeper. We have 3 different types of public domains, and the tool handles all 3. We have standard domains with load balancing, geo-routed domains for services in multiple regions around the world, and regional domains for routing to a specific region. The sync daemon has been very helpful in keeping our infrastructure nimble.

If this interests you, I'll be giving a talk about our cloud infrastructure in a few weeks in San Francisco, along with our founder/CEO John Sheehan. Full announcement coming soon...




Will the talk be recorded? Can I sign up to be notified when the talk is available? I'm on the other side of the world but would be interested too.


I'll look into it and let you know!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: