Your post is impossible to follow. You jump to point to point without rhyme or reason many of which aren't really justified (even on a casual basis).
Here's just a few of the points you try to make:
- You don't think cellphone-driving laws work unless there is a cop literally with you 24/7.
- You think this device minimizes distracted driving (?)
- You think cellphone usage while driving is going to increase regardless (?)
- You feel that because cellphone usage while driving is going to increase (unsupported) and that Navdy is less distracting (unsupported) that Navdy is an improvement (?)
If you believe this stuff then you have to at least try a little tiny bit to justify it. Those are pretty far out there opinions some of which aren't really supported by the admittedly limited data we have.
Here's just a few of the points you try to make:
- You don't think cellphone-driving laws work unless there is a cop literally with you 24/7.
- You think this device minimizes distracted driving (?)
- You think cellphone usage while driving is going to increase regardless (?)
- You feel that because cellphone usage while driving is going to increase (unsupported) and that Navdy is less distracting (unsupported) that Navdy is an improvement (?)
If you believe this stuff then you have to at least try a little tiny bit to justify it. Those are pretty far out there opinions some of which aren't really supported by the admittedly limited data we have.