And your evidence that this isn't a zero-sum game, is, exactly, what?
Me probably. And all the folk I know with reading habits like mine who have not bothered getting an ebook reader yet, despite having problems seeing the floor for books sometimes.
edit - I think Amazon are complete and utter [redacted] over DRM, the 1984 debacle, their general attitude, etc. That said, I think they are probably right that everyone would make more money if the price dropped on ebooks. They are going about it in a very [redacted] way, of course. And even if they are right, their tactics seem pretty [redacted]. But that's Amazon being Amazon. Just because they are behaving like [redacted] doesn't mean that their economics isn't accurate.
Isn't the fact that we're still discussing a single screw up that was immediately rectified from 5 years ago evidence that Amazon is actually going about this DRM business in a pretty sensible way? Also, Amazons complete lack of interest in "fixing" the very easy DRM removal process seems to provide further evidence to the same end.
Sure, it'd be better if there was no DRM, but there's the perfect world and then there's the world we actually live in.
FWIW, I just bought a book (sequel to "a fire upon the deep" by vernon vinge) on kindle yesterday and it came with a "this book has no DRM at the request of the publisher" disclaimer.
So maybe we should complain about publishers rather than amazon at this point?
We can complain all we want, but I struggle to see how we can place meaningful pressure on publishers.
I wanted to say that it's like iTunes and the switch to non-DRM, but I think the dynamic is different with Amazon as there isn't any meaningful competition on the e-reader device market as there was (and is) on the MP3 player market, where DRM was a major pain and thus a driver for DRM-free.
Short of Amazon pressuring publishers to drop DRM (which could well happen, but there's not a lot of business upside to it, although do downside either), I guess it will take a viable competitor to the Kindle that Amazon can't or won't provide an app for for DRM to get pressured out by end user market force.
Either you can say the word or you can't. Luckily our language has ways of working around saying certain words, so you don't have to put in [redacted].
Me probably. And all the folk I know with reading habits like mine who have not bothered getting an ebook reader yet, despite having problems seeing the floor for books sometimes.
edit - I think Amazon are complete and utter [redacted] over DRM, the 1984 debacle, their general attitude, etc. That said, I think they are probably right that everyone would make more money if the price dropped on ebooks. They are going about it in a very [redacted] way, of course. And even if they are right, their tactics seem pretty [redacted]. But that's Amazon being Amazon. Just because they are behaving like [redacted] doesn't mean that their economics isn't accurate.