This is a move against SharePoint Online/Box/EMC's shitty thing. The proof will be how well it works.
Box can work well enough if you've got everyone on it and you're using it as your main file server. The problem is that if you want to use it with users who expect it to work like Dropbox, it's not really designed for that kind of nimble access.
The pricing is totally inline with the competitors on a per-seat basis. It's even cheaper if you have any of the think client instances.
Interesting to see how it plays out -- and what impact this will have on Box, now that it is delaying its IPO.
Please please please let companies use this instead of SharePoint. Anything sane.
Ah well, probably the kind of people who make "enterprise" buying decisions will not even SEE Zocalo on their perception radar, so it will never happen.
So I should have clarified, my experience is not with Syncolicity but with Documentum. Syncolicity might be great. Documentum, however, is/was just god awful.
Box can work well enough if you've got everyone on it and you're using it as your main file server. The problem is that if you want to use it with users who expect it to work like Dropbox, it's not really designed for that kind of nimble access.
The pricing is totally inline with the competitors on a per-seat basis. It's even cheaper if you have any of the think client instances.
Interesting to see how it plays out -- and what impact this will have on Box, now that it is delaying its IPO.