Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

So I guess minor updates are how we do things now.



Yup! Release early, release often. Linux (kernel), Gnome, Ubuntu, Firefox, and Chrome (and lots more) are all on scheduled updates.

Edit: The advantage to rapid releases is that you can roll out minor updates when they're ready without having to wait for big ones, and you don't have to rush big ones for a deadline. If you miss one release, it's no a big deal because there's another one coming right up. Release when it's ready!


Rapid releases != rapid major version number increments. If you update the major version number too often it becomes meaningless.

The Linux kernel is on version 3.15, for example.


Yes, it is meaningless, and they intentionally hide the version number now - the download page doesn't even show it. But what could a major version number mean? GNU Emacs was on version 1.x for so long they dropped the leading "1." and promoted the minor version number to the major version. Ubuntu just numbers their releases after the date, e.g. 12.04 came out in April 2012.


> GNU Emacs was on version 1.x for so long they dropped the leading "1." and promoted the minor version number to the major version.

As did Java. Java 1.4 was released in 2002, and the next version was Java 5 in 2006.


Quote from Wikipedia that expresses my viewpoint on the subject:

> In principle [...] the major number is increased when there are significant jumps in functionality such as changing the framework which could cause incompatibility with interfacing systems, the minor number is incremented when only minor features or significant fixes have been added, and the revision number is incremented when minor bugs are fixed.


agree, these should be point releases I'd wager. However, they have to "keep up with the Joneses" (chrome, in this case) which has high numbered versions, I'm guessing...


The fact that you don't know what version you're on is intentional on both sides. Both Google and Mozilla realized that the version is meaningless and hid it.


Firefox has been doing rapid releases since April 2011 or so, it's not a recent thing. :)

https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease


I wasn't criticising. I just noticed from the changelog for this release in particular was pretty close to "changed whitespace in code"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: