Either a) the author knew this and didn't think such a major policy shift was worth addressing or b) was ignorant.
This is what I mean - the article was poorly written / researched. China has many problems, the article doesn't have any substance. It's divisive, and inaccurate in several key "facts".
Either a) the author knew this and didn't think such a major policy shift was worth addressing or b) was ignorant.
This is what I mean - the article was poorly written / researched. China has many problems, the article doesn't have any substance. It's divisive, and inaccurate in several key "facts".