Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

In addition, if you were to replace the Rails router with a Ruby trie implementation, it would be even faster. (not that this is encouraged)



I wrote the trie implementation referenced in the benchmarks. I didn't do it for speed, I did it because I couldn't add the router functionality I needed using the existing underlying implementation.


Cool, nice work! I didn't actually look at the benchmark and was just making (perhaps poor) assumptions. I'd imagine it does come with a nice little performance boost though?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: