No, because cstheory is for academics, and it isn't a research question. Besides, nobody is actually on those sites, so those discussions don't happen there.
I'm sorry, I should have linked http://cs.stackexchange.com instead. I do see the problem with having to ask questions on the other sites where there are fewer people to answer them, but certainly that's something that can be ameliorated if people are increasingly persuaded to make use of them?
I don't think anything new has been said about the scope of Stack Overflow for a long time - everyone agrees on the specifics (by and large), the only real point of contention is whether you like the way things are or not. If you do, great! If you don't - you're probably not going to get the people in charge to change their minds at this point.
What do you mean by "nobody is actually on those sites"? It seems to have quite a bit of activity to me, with some quite detailed replies. It's not hundreds of posts a day, but high-quality posts appear at a rate of a few to a few dozen per day (depending on the day), which is about the right volume for a high S:N ratio community (good mailing lists tend to top out around there as well).
I mean that I went there to try out the officially approved solution, and quickly found that there weren't a lot of interesting questions being asked, or much discussion. Indeed a lot of the questions that were asked were there only because they were moved from the main site, and it wasn't clear to me that the people asking the questions actually saw the answers.
