Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why do you have to redistribute something in order to modify it? Just modify it for your own personal use.


Since when do you need a license to modify something for your own personal use? If they've given me access to the source, I can just start editing to my heart's content...


Practically, yes, but legally, you may not have the rights to.

That's why it's explicitly listed as part of Freedom 1 of the four freedoms of software: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html


DVD players.


I can't think of a single use case where I would want to hack on a 32 year old OS without distributing it.


Not quite the same, but it may be good enough for you: I guess you can distribute a patch, combined with a URL to the original download.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: