Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

There's only a "clear trend" on homosexuality if you limit your timeframe.

Attitudes toward homosexuality in ancient Greece, for example, were pretty liberal. They were also really different from anything we have today, such that it defies putting it anywhere on a spectrum that modern folks would be familiar with.

Society moves in many directions, often simultaneously, and we should be careful not to confuse the movement of the last century or so with either inevitability or rightness.

(I personally think that consenting adults should be allowed to have whatever sort of sex and marriage they feel like, I just object to the idea that there's a clear trend on the issue overall.)




> Attitudes toward homosexuality in ancient Greece, for example, were pretty liberal.

As they were in India. That's why it's usually more instructive to look at the median, rather than the outliers.

Furthermore: It's debatable to what extent it makes sense to include historical timeframes on which we have lacking or inconclusive data.


How much of history do we really have good data on it, though? How do you figure out the median with so much missing data?

All in all, it sounds like you're agreeing with me: it's wrong to claim a trend.


> All in all, it sounds like you're agreeing with me: it's wrong to claim a trend.

I'm undecided, but leaning towards seeing a trend (yes, even with historical uncertainties). I'm absolutely willing, though, to attest that to the fact that I'm seeing a trend that would suit me.


I don't see any problem at all with pointing out a local trend. Abolition, women's suffrage, civil rights, desegregation, women's rights, gay rights - in every case, a low-status class of people promoted to more equal rights. Also, in every case, xenophobia replaced by inclusion.

Just because half the population is still dragging their heels about the latest oppressed group to get this kind of attention, like they always do, does not mean that there's anything special or more complicated about this case. It's still privileged people being asses to less privileged people for as long as they can possibly get away with. Like they always do. Imagine if people could be accepting in the general case, without being dragged to it?


I agree that there's no problem with pointing out a local trend, but I didn't read it as being local in the original comment. Statements like "Society moves in a certain direction" make it sound like a statement that's supposed to apply universally, and it very much does not.

Sure, all of your examples point in the same direction, because you chose examples that point in that direction. There are plenty of examples to be had of the opposite direction.

We happen to be in a locale, both in space and time, where there's a strong trend towards more inclusion and more rights. But if you expand out to the planet and the long term, I simply don't see the trend. Things get better in some times and places, and worse in others, and overall we just sort of oscillate around.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: