It's a fact of life that resumes are crucial and that structure makes a difference. But I've noticed that people often disagree about approaches.
This particular resume is based on a template that people in a channel liked. I've received a number of compliments IRL regarding both the layout and the content.
The only thing that people IRL seem to agree should go is the part about reasons for leaving.
The resume does need a new release. For example, I should start to fill in the years after 2009. But it isn't the resume that's the primary issue here. It's the fact that the market has shifted away from generalists, combined with mistakes that I've made.
FWIW, I've heard multiple recruiters and managers/directors compliment me on my resume style [1]. It's a bit more narrative and a bit less focused on bulleting out skills. This seems to attract more progressive forward thinkers (if you're into those sorts of companies).
At the same time, it does highlight my skills at the top of each area of experience, so some developers reading my resume may skim over the narrative part, focusing on the listed skills. So it works for them too.
It's also quite honest in a few areas that may turn off some people, but to me, it turns off the right people (those I don't want to work for).
[1] Check it out in my profile if you're interested.
That sounds about right. In my experience most recruiters are only capable of matching two words, with very little understanding of what the words actually mean. They have no idea that RDBMS / Oracle/ SQL are synonymous to a degree.
Be careful about trusting compliments people give you when they're physically standing in front of you. When people are looking you in the eye, they tend to tell you what they think you want to hear. Online communication creates a distance that makes people more likely to speak their mind.
This particular resume is based on a template that people in a channel liked. I've received a number of compliments IRL regarding both the layout and the content.
The only thing that people IRL seem to agree should go is the part about reasons for leaving.
The resume does need a new release. For example, I should start to fill in the years after 2009. But it isn't the resume that's the primary issue here. It's the fact that the market has shifted away from generalists, combined with mistakes that I've made.