this 4d is actually harder since each dimension is 2x2. 7052 :/ still haven't be... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		tobeportable on March 18, 2014 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: 2048 in 4D this 4d is actually harder since each dimension is 2x2. 7052 :/ still haven't beaten it..

dbaupp on March 18, 2014 [–]

Yes, but the smallest interesting 5d one is 2x2x2x2x2, i.e. 32 squares, which is much more flexible than the 16 squares of the original (and of this one).

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact