Insofar as you take as premise that the arrangement was good in the first place, it doesn't really follow that it's abusive for the telecoms to continue to bill for infrastructure costs associated with maintaining and building their ability to tap to meet government demands. It's not as if there has been 0 infrastructure buildout since 1994.

Just because it's illegal doesn't mean it's abusive. Rather, the 1994 law seems quite abusive.