Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Very simple: the striking workers were considered criminals - rabble that no upstanding citizen would want to get associated with. Today, they'd be called terrorists.

Now think about how today, the American military gets away with bombing weddings...




To be honest it was a high risk wedding. They couldn't just let innocent people go.

After all, one of America's founding fathers said - "I'd rather murder trillions with my bear hands, than let a guilty man go free".

^ Note: Bear arms is not an error.


Both John Adams and Benjamin Franklin appear to have believed in the "Blackstone's formulation":

It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackstone%27s_formulation

Do you have a citation for who said your quote - I'm not an American but that really doesn't sound like something one of their founders would have said (of course, I could well be wrong!).


It was obviously sarcasm. The style, the connotation, the number (?! which is preposterous).

I guess the old adage about sarcasm being indistinguishable from regular internet posts.


Oops - my sarcasm detector failed to fire.

BTW You may be thinking of Poe's Law:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law

"Without a blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of extremism or fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing."


I think he meant it facetiously.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: