Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I didn't know that the one of the things we (the U.S.) are pushing for is patents on surgical procedures. The mind boggles. And then it fucking explodes.



The New Zealand government has an agency, Pharmac, that buys drugs for the country. This gives a fair bit of purchasing power. The TPP seeks to tame Pharmac, to drive prices up presumably. Prevention of generic drug purchasing etc. But there isn't any agreement to remove tariffs on things NZ makes. http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&obj...


Given the rise of 'robotic-assisted surgery', it shouldn't come as much of a surprise. It's difficult to decouple the medical procedure from the hardware/software involved: robotic arms, the code behind it, machine vision bits, etc.

While far from a medical technotopia, this seems less insidious that patents on DNA sequences or even pharama in my mind.


I appreciate your post. However it's not at all difficult to separate the procedure from the machine used to perform it, whatever it may be. The latter is already coverable by a utility patent on the physical tools. The former is simply a description of steps, and in the case of robotic surgeries it will invariably be software.

But we're not just talking about software here. The U.S. is trying to make medical procedures patentable in all but the most manual cases. In other words, only if a procedure can be done completely by hand is it exempt; the moment you use any sort of "medical device" in the surgery then the steps themselves become protected intellectual property, in addition to the utility patents on the devices themselves.

Source: http://keionline.org/node/1825


I fail to see how a "procedure" in any sense could be patentable subject matter. If you've developed a robotic arm that can perform a surgical procedure you get a patent on the arm itself; not the motions it makes or the software it runs. That is abstract and ridiculous.


I begin to wonder whether the US isn't just trolling, to sink the treaty on purpose.


OH, no it's real. Remember US was the one that came up with SOPA and ACTA, too. It wasn't China. It was US, the land of the free. They wouldn't be "trolling" 3 times in a row. They're serious about this.


That seems outlandish, but I honestly don't have a better explanation.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: