> the claim from GCHQ etc is that they have acted fully within the law.
And you're going to just believe the claim? Come on. Actually, if all that was fully legal, that is IMHO more shocking.
> It would be good if people recognised how biased The Guardian is. It has an agenda
And yet you can't see GCHQ' self-serving agenda. I see that you "trust your government to do the right thing". The right thing for who, them or you? Why do you trust them and not other parties?
> The inquiry into the "expenses scandal" ... What the hell was the point of that
And you don't see the point of uncovering corruption in elected officials either? Perhaps you don't want your trust undermined? Nice selective use of logic there!
And you're going to just believe the claim? Come on. Actually, if all that was fully legal, that is IMHO more shocking.
> It would be good if people recognised how biased The Guardian is. It has an agenda
And yet you can't see GCHQ' self-serving agenda. I see that you "trust your government to do the right thing". The right thing for who, them or you? Why do you trust them and not other parties?
> The inquiry into the "expenses scandal" ... What the hell was the point of that
And you don't see the point of uncovering corruption in elected officials either? Perhaps you don't want your trust undermined? Nice selective use of logic there!