It's so nice to see news from years ago making it back as 'new' headlines. Whatever.
Feedback for such schemes has been the following-
a: that people felt incredibly unsafe (especially women) and stopped going out out night, regardless of being able to turn the lights on.
b: non locals, travelers, elderly people, disabled and so on can't use it easily. period.
c: most street lights are high power sodium lights, which are (According to wikipedia and other sources) one of, if not the most, efficient form of distributing energy in the form of light. They also happen to have a fairly significant startup time, so motion sensors wouldn't be very efficient. It's not obvious that replacing with more efficient startup lamps and motion sensors would help.
d: would you want to drive where your eyes would constantly have to re-dilate as the lights come on?
e: i've seen some pilot programs that have photovoltaic collection plates on top of street light stands, which collect energy during the day to activate the light at night. Feels more like the future we've been looking for.
I'd much rather see policies which force office lights, computers and so on be turned off at night (or face fines, etc) than street lights that work less efficiently.
This reminds me of a similar setup that I learned about during pilot training: a lot of small untowered airports use a pilot-controlled runway lighting setup that is controlled by pilots clicking their radios on a certain frequency to turn on the runway lighting at night, adjust brightness, etc.
Installing the buttons incurs a capital cost, and then there's the cost of maintenance, and the risk that vandals will pound on the buttons just for the hell of it.
By contrast, the Dial4Light system builds on infrastructure for both control and authentication that already exists.
That would just be more expensive and less reliable. buttons would do the trick, except for the case you want to have lights on in the moment you are leaving your house.
It's an interesting idea, but the town has only 9,000 people. I wonder how this operation would work in a larger setting, or perhaps more importantly, how it is safeguarded from abuse.
Also curious if there is an app for that...
Edit: on second thought, abuse might really be a non-issue, since the limit for abuse isn't worse than what they had to deal with originally and text message can be tracked with some ease.
Nice. Ideally, with more cell phones getting GPS, eventually it'd be possible to set up one's cell phone to communicate one's position to the central lighting facility, and have it turn on the lights as I approach them, and off the lights after I've passed them by.
That sounds like a Viz top tip - "HACKERS: save money on torches by waving your expensive, brightly-lit mobile around in front of you while walking down the road in the dead of night."
It's so nice to see news from years ago making it back as 'new' headlines. Whatever.
Feedback for such schemes has been the following-
a: that people felt incredibly unsafe (especially women) and stopped going out out night, regardless of being able to turn the lights on.
b: non locals, travelers, elderly people, disabled and so on can't use it easily. period.
c: most street lights are high power sodium lights, which are (According to wikipedia and other sources) one of, if not the most, efficient form of distributing energy in the form of light. They also happen to have a fairly significant startup time, so motion sensors wouldn't be very efficient. It's not obvious that replacing with more efficient startup lamps and motion sensors would help.
d: would you want to drive where your eyes would constantly have to re-dilate as the lights come on?
e: i've seen some pilot programs that have photovoltaic collection plates on top of street light stands, which collect energy during the day to activate the light at night. Feels more like the future we've been looking for.
I'd much rather see policies which force office lights, computers and so on be turned off at night (or face fines, etc) than street lights that work less efficiently.