Bring a California company in front of a Texas jury, and call wild-haired Stanford visiting professor Diffie as a witness? I'm afraid this says more about the bigotry of the jury members toward Californians than it does about the case. My hunch is they (wrongly in so many ways) thought they would teach the hippie a lesson.
Ahh yes. Nothing but knuckle draggers out there. Am I right? Nevermind all the great engineering schools, top cancer centers, and major tech hubs. Nope. Texas is nothing but racist bigots despite being one of the most racially and culturally (the most?) states in the union.
Believe it or not, the lower right 1/3 of the US is a little more diverse than is portrayed on Dallas and The Dukes of Hazzard.
I grew up and live in the lower right 1/3 of the US and his depiction is not that far off. Based on totally made up statistics that I'm pulling from my nether regions right now I'd guess at least one jury member had the exact thought the GP mentioned, while at least a few others just subconsciously would not lend credibility to the "dirty hippy."
I think you're absolutely right. In fact, the TQP lawyer went on the attack, which would be a miscalculation anywhere but Texas:
> TQP lawyer Marc Fenster could have acknowledged Diffie's accomplishments while arguing that his client—an admittedly little guy—still should get his rights, his little piece of "intellectual property."
> That's not what Fenster did. He went on the attack.