Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

He lost 60 pounds by monitoring his carb intake.

The thing about diets is that everybody has got one that worked for them.

It seems to me that the one thing all of these different diets have in common is that they require the person to monitor what they eat. Whatever the specifics of the diet, the dieter ends up paying more attention to their meals in general and that extra digilgence translates into reduced caloric intake.

I'm not making a judgment on the nutritional value of any particular diet, just the underlying mechanism for why different diets all have somebody claiming that they work.

Even the twinkie diet: http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/11/08/twinkie.diet.professor/




Anyone can lose weight simply reducing calories, but that weight loss isn't permanent or sustainable, and it may not be healthy. If you run the numbers, the Twinkie Diet guy was actually eating fewer carbs than the average American simply because of calorie restriction, and his low protein intake would almost certainly result in the loss of muscle mass.

The age old advice of "eat less, move more" ignores the body's natural mechanism for fat regulation, which is primarily the hormone insulin. The higher your blood glucose, the more insulin your body produces, the more fat your body will store, and the less reluctant it will be to release its stored energy.

It's obvious that if you're eating fewer calories, then less energy is available for fat storage -- it's simple thermodynamics -- but basic endocrinology tells us that to lose weight all we need is the negative stimulus of insulin, which is primarily achieved through reducing carbohydrate intake.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: