Caching is always faster than any web framework, so I don't think a faster web framework add much value to most companies. Choose a framework that makes it easy to add caching.
I assume you mean reverse-proxy caching and not back-end caching. Not all use cases are suitable for reverse-proxy caching. Blogs, news sites, and the like are very suitable. Applications that are heavily personalized or work with private data are unsuitable for reverse proxying.
Our test cases are explicitly concerned with exercising performance when reverse proxying is not suitable, for whatever reason. If reverse proxying works for your use-case, definitely consider using it.