Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

40km != 87 miles, as you note. This appears to be a transcription error in the article from an earlier 140km, and it should read 25 miles per year.

(at least, if the graph is correct)




I think they were using the kg to pounds factor!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: