Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's got nothing to do with monopoly!!! Apple or Linux have nothing to do with it; the ruling being for behaviour in the period that preceded 2000. Microsoft were in a dominant position in one market and leveraged this dominace to gain dominance in another. This is anti-competative. for the final time; a monopoly is not illeagal in and of itself, neither is it antitrust.



There's actually no evidence that your claim about leverage is true. Microsoft simply built a better browser and marketed it better than Netscape.

It's also a fact that the DoJ lost the browser case: it was overturned 2-1 on appeal.


Looks like someone didn't read my post :)


Looks like someone isn't reading anything!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: