Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Given that he failed to make money off of his own inventions, he doesn't seem to have had a good grasp on that side of affairs. Like a lot of good technologists he seems to have assumed that if you can just produce more good stuff, it somehow gets shared where it needs to be. Reality isn't so simple.

This selective blindness isn't so surprising. Genius in one area does not imply genius in another.




You think he aimed to make money? He clearly didn't try to profit from his inventiveness personally.

Just because the majority of us here on HN are selfish, doesn't mean Stanford was! ;)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: