I was thinking in the context of domestic use along the border or for use with drug interdiction.
Also, I can think of uses for temporarily incapacitating people. The US government sends in an airstrike along a corridor covered by airbases. However, when the opposing air forces try to scramble their jets, their pilots are incapacitated and harassed by quadcopter drones deployed from a container dropped earlier by a stealthed drone. I think there would be a lot of uses for such capability for special forces units.
A cluster bomb delivered in that same container would be cheaper, more effective and with less risk to fail.
In military applications, it is almost always easier to permanently incapacitate people. Tech for temporary incapacitation is needed only in those very rare cases where we really, really need someone alive; where the capture is so vital that it's worth risking and often spending our troop lives to achieve that.
You wouldn't feel playful about being harassed by Tasers. But yes, this is bending over backwards to avoid killing people. It would be easier to just bomb them.
It'd be more reliable just to blow the pilots aircraft up before they got off the ground. (Or the runway for that matter.) You can disable a fighter with a couple of bullets from a handgun easily enough, they're fragile in that way.
Also, I can think of uses for temporarily incapacitating people. The US government sends in an airstrike along a corridor covered by airbases. However, when the opposing air forces try to scramble their jets, their pilots are incapacitated and harassed by quadcopter drones deployed from a container dropped earlier by a stealthed drone. I think there would be a lot of uses for such capability for special forces units.