This is exactly what I logged in to write. For a website called statwing.com there is a lack of statistics in this article.
At the top is the disclaimer: "this is not a scientific study". Then they present their data and bring up some new questions based on their findings and link to their stats tool.
The problem is: their are no conclusions to be drawn from this, no new questions that arise, no discussion we can have- its the back of a cereal box.
If they do a little more work and show that they have found something meaningful- then we'll talk.
At the top is the disclaimer: "this is not a scientific study". Then they present their data and bring up some new questions based on their findings and link to their stats tool.
The problem is: their are no conclusions to be drawn from this, no new questions that arise, no discussion we can have- its the back of a cereal box.
If they do a little more work and show that they have found something meaningful- then we'll talk.