Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Yeah, I get that it's valid Perl code, but it doesn't cause the computer to do something, or give an interesting output. A human can read it and find it interesting. I tried to say that in a witty way. Oh well...



Oh man, imagine a poem like this that outputted something relevant to the theme of the poem. That'd be amazing.


C'mon man, this is Perl. Easy things are easy, Hard things are possible.

In reverse:

https://gist.github.com/justingit/6533386


omg, just ran that in perl. epic.



So what if it doesn't do anything?


The commenter isn't putting it down for that, just explaining he'd be surprised if it did anything let alone something mischievous.


It not doing anything isn't the point. The point is that it's technically valid code, but is still relevant to human interpretation.


It not doing anything matters - generally, code poetry is something that does do something interesting while being relevant to human interpretation; so code that simply validates syntactically isn't that amazing.


This was the point I was trying to make.


Well, he's answering @bmmayer1's question. It does not do anything, so it is safe to run on your computer.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: