Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sorry but I'm not sure I understand your reasoning. Judging by your writing, you sound very young and inexperienced.

The definition of employment is trading some kind of value (usually knowledge, skill and labor) for money. When you work for a company, you are doing that trade with your employer, who in turn resells your services to their customers, while taking a cut of the profits. In effect, your employer is a middleman providing a degree of stability, security and pretty much instant ability to sell your services, in return for making a profit off your work. By being a startup owner/founder, you are doing essentially the same thing, except that now your boss is your customer. You still answer to somebody. As long as you want to sell something to the world, you will always have a 'boss'.

I don't see what's so wrong with working for another person. So what if it makes them richer, is that a bad thing? It also makes you richer, so equating it with "dealing with the devil" is just immature.



aah ... I think you should holding off throwing around labels like maturity, that's a bad way of making arguments.

Of course you're using a third party for branding/funding, however, as I mentioned in my original comment, corporations exist to reduce the transaction costs of collaborating and distributing - costs which are greatly reduced with widespread internet access.

This means you can have a 'virtual corporation', wherein you have much more freedom to decide your course of action.

In the end the customers is your boss - true, but you have much more say in what the product is (and this is good or bad, depending how skilled you are and your risk tolerance).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: