Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I guess I'm not seeing how game theory doesn't day both sides want a "dead hand" device. It's a commitment scheme.



It seems they would have a lot less incentive to do so if they were planning on attacking first. But thinking about it, that logic seems flawed since if they were planning to attack, they couldn't be 100% sure to destroy the ability for a retaliatory attack, so second strike ability was needed anyway. Ok, never mind then, you are right.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: