You know, this happens a lot here -- this exact same thing. Someone makes an elaborate piece of art with CSS, you get some response saying hey CSS wasn't meant for this and to complete the cycle finally you'd have a comment saying "but he's just being a hacker, this is how we get innovation!".
It's great we celebrate hacker culture, -- as we well should, but isn't art via CSS getting a bit hackneyed by now? And are there really people still out there who're unaware that they can do this kind of snazzy stuff with CSS?
Certainly though if for example someone mockingly questioned something like Fabrice Bellard's PC emulator in Javascript for its lack of practical good we would rightfully come down on them. I certainly don't mean to criticize the author here -- he is very obviously an expert at CSS, but I'm not sure if we can put 'fella who built a helicopter' in the same category as CSS art.
It's not in the same category as CSS art in the sense they're equivalent accomplishments. I imagine a helicopter failure has a potentially lethal outcome vs. carpal tunnel for repeated CSS hacking.
They are in the same category as... "because I can". Which doesn't seem like something worthy of celebration, but creative expression in unexpected forms should be admired regardless of medium.
> Are there really people still out there who're unaware that they can do this kind of snazzy stuff with CSS?
It's great we celebrate hacker culture, -- as we well should, but isn't art via CSS getting a bit hackneyed by now? And are there really people still out there who're unaware that they can do this kind of snazzy stuff with CSS?
Certainly though if for example someone mockingly questioned something like Fabrice Bellard's PC emulator in Javascript for its lack of practical good we would rightfully come down on them. I certainly don't mean to criticize the author here -- he is very obviously an expert at CSS, but I'm not sure if we can put 'fella who built a helicopter' in the same category as CSS art.