As elsewhere, the expectation of "just another face in the crowd" pseudo-privacy.
When we (as a society, by which I mean my grandparents parents) agreed to have "unique identifiers" prominently displayed on vehicles we own, the reasoning behind that decision was based on a different reality.
This is _very much_ scope-creep - without anyone affected being asked whether it's OK.
If there was a proposal to have police all stop 1000 people per shift to check and record their ID, people and civil liberty groups would be up in arms (perhaps literally).
Is this _very_ much different? Shouldn't we at least have had a discussion about it before rolling it out without letting anybody know what was going on?
When we (as a society, by which I mean my grandparents parents) agreed to have "unique identifiers" prominently displayed on vehicles we own, the reasoning behind that decision was based on a different reality.
This is _very much_ scope-creep - without anyone affected being asked whether it's OK.
If there was a proposal to have police all stop 1000 people per shift to check and record their ID, people and civil liberty groups would be up in arms (perhaps literally).
Is this _very_ much different? Shouldn't we at least have had a discussion about it before rolling it out without letting anybody know what was going on?