Clearly, there should be laws mandating that everyone who knows Java, has visited that Wikipedia page, or walks outside radio stations be surveilled at all times, to ensure people's safety.
"be surveilled at all times" We already are, everybody.
Its worse than that, unfortunately. About a decade before SAME started showing up on public for profit broadcasters, they had it on NOAA weather radio (you know, 162.4 MHz and several other channels in that area). So this has been around since the late 80s or so.
Well my bright idea was to latch on to the then popular craze in electronics magazines of make a project using a (then new) PIC, convince a magazine to run the article, sell my pre-programmed PICs to people, and retire to a private island (LOL... but I probably could have made my programmer pay for itself, at least). So I had a PC/AT class machine with a soundblaster 16 generating SAME codes using, if I recall, a BASIC program. The plan was a simple zero crossing detector and what amounts to a software "bit banged" UART and some UI code to drive a LCD module. Back when the PIC16 family was "new" this ended up not fitting, or at least my UI would have been ridiculously crude with little translation and filtering features so I dropped the whole thing. I could fit a really good UI in there or the decoder but not both and I didn't think a multi-chip solution fit the "standards" of the time. Now a days this would be a one chip PIC probably on an arduino shield with real analog input instead of zero crossing detector and all that, and enough space for a monster UI probably. The "target market" at the time was ham radio equipped storm chaser type guys who wanted a SAME radio for "them" rather than for fixed locations. Very travel and location oriented. Now a days of course they just use a smartphone and an app like proweatheralert or just the weather.gov webpage. I don't know if there's a startup lesson buried in here other than its possible to come up with an idea that greatly exceeds the technological limits of the day, not just at the super high end like big data, but also at the super low end.
Anyway the point is you'd have to ban virtually any post 1980's era stuff, including at least some pre-PC era home computers. A PC XT with an original soundblaster should be sufficient to encode SAME tones, its not like I was stressing out my old spare 286 while encoding test tones for my PIC based decoder.
The general development plan of a SAME encoder is about the same as a morse code sender. If you can figure out one, you can figure out the other. So you make a tone generating function. (and for SAME you need two tones, no big deal). Then you send the proper length of each aka a 1 bit transmitter. Then a function to send a whole byte at a time (big endian or little endian?) aka a 8 bit/1 byte transmitter. Then a function that eats a string and calls the byte sender for each byte of the string and optimistically stops when it hits the end of the variable length string. Then a function that eats some vaguely "human compatible" API and squirts out a line of SAME which is fed to the function above. And a zillion subroutines/function calls later, you get an audio SAME message. Making something that sends morse code is developed about the same way.
Its noob-compatible. No need for recursion, scalability is irrelevant, etc. As I recall the ancient PIC16 series didn't do recursion very well at the assembly language level.
It was a detailed technical ramble about how I made a SAME encoder using 80s era hardware and software because I was poor in the early/mid 90s because I was trying to "startup" a little hardware project to sell a mobile car SAME decoder optimized for storm chaser people (and more likely electronics fiends in general). The whole market segment has pretty much been replaced in the 2010's by smartphones and 3G networks so I'm not exactly worried about giving away my idea.
Turns out the encoder was really easy to make using 1980s era stuff, but the tech required to pull off the decoder product greatly exceeded the technological/economic limitations of the time, so that's why the project failed. Oh well.
The point was a raid to eliminate fancy Java and GUIs and modern computers won't stop forbidden SAME encoders from being written, they'd actually have to raid and confiscate museum pieces.
It would be like trying to forbid DES-56 by getting rid of everything DES-56 capable. That's a lot more than year 2012 quad core pentiums, that includes my 25 year old HP-48 calculator...
Another interesting note is that I'm sure the security theater guys would like to calm people by claiming it takes millions of dollars and dozens of people and years of effort and top of the line modern high tech stuff to make a SAME encoder, but I did it alone as a poor yet smart kid using junkpile stuff decades ago in a ridiculously short amount of time. The only reason this doesn't get hacked on a regular basis, is despite the paranoid delusion that they're all out to get us, they actually are not, because they would have gotten us a zillion times over already, if "they" actually wanted to, which they obviously do not desire to do. Some lower forms of humanity profit off convincing people to be hostile toward each other, nothing new there.
Thank you very much for your stories! I agree, it is quite easy. A transmitter for the VHF FM band that EAS uses is fairly simple to construct. I was really, really surprised at the lack of authentication combined with relaying mandated by law. I'm glad I'm not the only one who was concerned!
