Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is not what I have read before about the US constitution. It was very clear at the time the constitution was ratified by the States that they would keep their sovereignty and therefore have a right to secede. Why would it be otherwise, in a country that fought for its independence in the first place?

http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/secession-its-constitutional/

It's not because there was the Civil War that the Civil War outcome was Lawful. The Southern States had the right to secede and that right was not recognized by Lincoln.




At the risk of making an ad hominem attack, I seriously wouldn't take an op-ed in WND as a credible analysis of US Constitutional law.


Well that's what I could find in 5 mins online, but I'm sure there are other, better articles out there about that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: