It wasn't URLs that break RFC 3986, it was more an instance of Postel's Law where some common URLs people might send and parse in HTTP messages every day actually weren't allowed in HTTP according to the upgrade path from RFC 2396. When I became worried about that possibility I decided to jump back to 2396 since that's the RFC that 2616 truly inherits from.
Also, I'm curious for examples of URLs that break RFC 3986[1].
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986