Well, call me a.... whatever... but reads to me like they want to blame everything other than their rubbish movies that are not worth having a permanent DVD copy of, and the stupid amount of money they insist on spending to make a movie.
These days, it seems the best movies are low budget, and worth buying a DVD of to keep. The big expensive "block buster" movies are very often watch once, enjoy for the moment, and forget. That can be cinema, netflix, torrents, who cares? The movie isn't actually worth caring about.
I actually disagree. I am more likely to go to the theater or buy a legitimate copy of a big budget movie than a low budget one, since I'll pay a bit extra for the highest quality experience of the effects. I still love going to the theater, so I see more movies there than by any other method, but for small movies like The King's Speech (not an example of a classic "low budget" movie, but hopefully you get the idea, the scale is small), I'm way more likely to wait for a way I can see it for free (or in one of the streams I already pay for: HBO, Netflix, Amazon Prime, etc.)
It may also be your movie tastes differ from his too. Right now I am noticing basically two groups of people (not correlated to age): one group which enjoys the effects, 3D, epicness... and the other which is disillusioned with today's movies (ie yay another movie where I watch CGI dudes shoot around and then get a 3D fly-over the battle-field every 5 seconds).
I think there is something to be said for the funneling of movie budgets into a few MASSIVELY costing movies (ie per the Spielberg interview that was posted on HN last week). I, myself, enjoy a good "Dark Knight", but also something like the King's Speech or The Tree of Life. The question is whether both can keep being made for their respective budgets, and both in film vs other media.
I actually enjoy both quite a bit, and am likely too see both types in theaters. My point was simply given enough money to pay for the highest quality experience of one movie, I'll pay for the big budget action film over the small scale but still high quality movie. I feel I can enjoy the smaller movies just as much on a TV at home. Seeing The Dark Knight in IMAX is a hugely different experience than at home.
> their rubbish movies that are not worth having a permanent DVD copy of,
You seem to think that making awful movies is something new? it is not. These guys do a lot of testing to make sure their movies are wanted. As much as anyone can.
These days, it seems the best movies are low budget, and worth buying a DVD of to keep. The big expensive "block buster" movies are very often watch once, enjoy for the moment, and forget. That can be cinema, netflix, torrents, who cares? The movie isn't actually worth caring about.