Others in this topic's comment page made observations to the contrary. Thus a discussion can go no further without more information. That's why you were asked for "citation referencing these problems."
You responded with an extreme, which was disingenuous, I agree.
In any case, any Hofstader fan knows what you mean now. Thank you for confirming that you agree that there is no meaningful basis for your opinion that the UK government should change its aid policies, and that your personal observations of the matter are not relevant.
I did not state it was citable or sound, but an observation.
The observation/hypothesis is valuable as it's the starting point for a discussion.
Presenting the extreme is disingenuous.
The answer to the correctness of my argument is neither yes or no - it is simply mu.