Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think you lack reading comprehension.

I did not say George Orwell was behind the concept stated.

I did not agree with the solution/suggestion presented by the Singaporean government.

I said the hate-mongering articles/rumours posted by these sites for ad-money _IS A PROBLEM_ that can easily be handled by refuting their bs with proof and transparency.

Seriously, reading comprehension. Though I do think my sentences were poorly structured, it did not say what you you seem to think it said.




No, my reading comprehension is fine. You explicitly endorsed the measure and write not a single word that could be construed to refer to "proof and transparency".

EDIT this response was submitted before "Though I do think my sentences were poorly structured, it did not say what you you seem to think it said." was added.


"- they open up to more transparency and would somehow counter most of the bs articles."

Again, it's poorly structured, but not as poorly as missing the entire word "transparency"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: