Sort-of. If the copies came with a license agreement forbidding you giving a copy to the press, then you might be liable if you did.

Furthermore if members of the press got a copy, they might be forbidden from publishing the test in full. A sample single question from the test (alluding to illegal activity) would likely be fair-use.

"Sort-of. If the copies came with a license agreement forbidding you giving a copy to the press, then you might be liable if you did."

Except that you do not need a license unless you are making copies. The only reason you see licenses with software is that the process of installing software is making a copy of that software. Books do not come with licenses, because you do not copy a book in order to read it.

"Furthermore if members of the press got a copy, they might be forbidden from publishing the test in full."

I am pretty sure that even a full reproduction in a newspaper could be fair use, since it is for purely journalistic purposes and the publishing of the questionnaire would not impact the market in any way (the scrutiny by the press might, but criticism is also covered by fair use).

Actually, software licenses aren't required to simply use a program - though you can certainly obtain a copy by licensing it.

Essentially, copies made that are inherently required for the expected function of the work (to the HD if required, to RAM, to screen, etc) aren't copyright violations. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/117