> If compromise is impossible, coercion is the only answer, right?
Not necessarily. Ideally, these people should be ignored. It isn't until they are actively standing in the way of freedom that real conflict should occur.
> That's the danger: if you can't even admit the possibility you're wrong, you really have no options apart from agreement or conflict.
Like I said, there is plenty of gray in the world (like how to best promote freedom). But I and every person who values freedom should be prepared for conflict. And I'm ok with not having any other options other than conflict if it means freedom.
Not necessarily. Ideally, these people should be ignored. It isn't until they are actively standing in the way of freedom that real conflict should occur.
> That's the danger: if you can't even admit the possibility you're wrong, you really have no options apart from agreement or conflict.
Like I said, there is plenty of gray in the world (like how to best promote freedom). But I and every person who values freedom should be prepared for conflict. And I'm ok with not having any other options other than conflict if it means freedom.